National Aeronca Association Bulletin Board

A discussion group for all Aeronca owners and fans
It is currently Wed Sep 08, 2010 07:47

All times are UTC - 7 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: FAR 61.53
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 19:24 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 18:18
Posts: 643
Location: Georgia GA10/OPN
Spin doctors can make numbers say anything. The FAA in posting accident records should differentate between purely trained Sport Pilots and Certificated Pilots flying light sport without a current medical using their drivers license. As long as Cessna is building a $100,000+ light sport SkyCatcher aircraft, the 1320# rule will never be eliminated for the C150 or other aircraft. Deep pockets.

Doug

_________________
Keep the pointed end forward--
The dirty side down.....
And the blue skies on top....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FAR 61.53
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 19:34 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 19:55
Posts: 95
Location: Oklahoma City
In my simplistic perception of life, the Sport Pilot certificate allows the holder to fly without a medical, as long as the pilot considers himself healthy enough to fly and has a valid driver's license.
This allows people like epileptics or diabetics on medication who can legally drive, and would have never qualify for a FAA medical, to fly as Sport Pilots. If a private, commercial or ATP allows his medical expire (not lost for medical reasons), he can continue to fly as Sport Pilot (with its legal limitations), for as long as he wants, as long as he has a valid driver's license,
EVEN if he later develops conditions that by written regulations would disqualify him for a FAA 3rd class medical (examples: angina, depression, malignancies, etc.), unless his regular physician (not an AME) prohibits him from flying or driving. Example: the epileptic on medication that after many years free of seizure , has a seizure.

Insurance companys have nothing legal to say about this. Remember: when you buy insurance, it is a bet between you and the insurance company: You bet them $600 that you are going to have an accident in one year. They bet you $25,000 that you are not going to have an accident. If you do not have an accident they keep your $600. If you do have an accidente they pay you $25,000. The usual rules of the bet are to be within the established FAR, annual, BFR, etc.
But also, the insurance company might decide not to bet (sell you insurance) with you, unless
you meet certain conditions: fly with an instructor, have a medical exam every six months, etc. etc. That can prevent you to buy insurance from that company, but will not prevent you to fly -uninsured- if you want to do so.

Pablo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FAR 61.53
PostPosted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 22:54 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:32
Posts: 46
Location: Corona CA
Doc wrote:



Lastly, the only difference between a 2nd class and a 3rd class is a 32" vision testing requirement for pilots 50 years old and older. With the new progressive lenses, a single pair of glass easily meets vision reuirements for 16", 32" and infinity.

Thanks for your questions/musings. Doc


I must add something to that: For a Class 2 medical the distance vision requirements are 20/20 in both eyes. For a Class 3 you need only 20/40 both eyes - for both, that can be with or without glasses/contacts.

I know, because I don't have a single health issue that would prevent me from getting a Class 1 medical, except my left eye won't correct to better than 20/40. For somebody who never wanted to be anything other than a pilot, that really, really sucks....

_________________
Peter, Corona CA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FAR 61.53
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 20:18 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 17:27
Posts: 38
Location: 1T8 Bulverde TX
I have really enjoyed the responses to this thread. For those who are holding Special Issuance medical certificates, you may have noticed that you are now required to keep a copy of the FAA authorization letter in your possession while exercising your privileges. Anyone want to claim "best answer"? Doc :roll:

_________________
Doc - 1T8
1946 A7AC NC2241E
EAA TC #5453
FAA Senior AME #20969


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FAR 61.53
PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 22:07 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 16:49
Posts: 1318
Location: San Martin, California
I'm not a big fan of these " I know something you don't know" threads. If there is information that needs to be spread it should be brought out into the open. And it's always good to have a SODA around.
Paul

_________________
Mailing Adress : Paul Agaliotis 2060 E. San Martin, San Martin,Calif. 95046


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FAR 61.53
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 08:15 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 17:27
Posts: 38
Location: 1T8 Bulverde TX
To all who responded...thanks. To avoid irritating anyone else, I will close the thread. Doc

_________________
Doc - 1T8
1946 A7AC NC2241E
EAA TC #5453
FAA Senior AME #20969


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Translated by Maël Soucaze © 2009 phpBB.fr